dleedlee wrote:First there was the scandal last year of organised crime working in with Kuala Lumpur International Airport baggage handlers to rip-off and steal from foreign travellers
I think that's pretty common problem in the industry as a whole.
In this instance, the issue was brought up because the Malaysian media made such a big song and dance about the whole thing. They painted it as a blow to Malaysian tourism, a blight on the face of Malaysia as a holiday destination for foreign travellers and so on and so forth -- then
claimed that the culprits had been uncovered, the crime ring smashed, and the errant employees dismissed and charges brought against them not long before Christmas last year. Then, reports started creeping out from Malaysian nationals and international visitors that the problem hadn't been dealt with at all; reports of baggage/luggage theft started to increase again in the months around Chinese New Year this year, before tapering off slightly before I flew up in May.
When I got home, surprise, surprise, my luggage had been broken into and rifled through -- this was brought to my attention by Customs here in Perth who picked up the violation immediately on receival of my suitcases. Which is why I'll be flying Singapore Airlines next time and avoiding (as well as not patronising the corrupt services that are MAS and KLIA) the Malaysian Peninsula altogether; oddly enough, Singapore Airlines offer a faster flight, and better connecting route, for where I have to travel to (the state of Sarawak on Borneo island), as well as a much more competitive fare. Guess it only took one bad experience with the trouble-fraught MAS and KLIA for me to cease my support of them...
Anyway, why should such a thing be dismissed as "common"? As an international domestic traveller who pays a premium price to commute in comfort and security, I
shouldn't have to expect these kinds of criminal activities simply because they're glibly written off as "common"...