http://hkmdb.com/db/search/results/TKl7 ... 7A-1.mhtml
our usual ??? Ho Fei Fan
?(little) ??? (only 1 entry in 1955)
? (new) ??? (only 1 entry in 1955)

absolutely the same situation with ??? Fong Yim-Fen http://hkmdb.com/db/search/results/evVh ... 2g-1.mhtml

Not sure what you're what saying but your statements are all true. To expand, typically, the new/little indicate different persons, e.g., Ma Sze Tsang and Sun-Ma Sze Tsang. In modern era, Cecilia Cheung was called Little Brigitte Lin and now Gong Mi is Little Cecilia Cheung because of their similarities in looks. Song Jia is sometimes called Xiao Song Jia to distinguish from a different Song Jia.

According to HKFA, these are aliases:
???? (????)
http://hkmdb.com/db/people/view.mhtml?i ... ay_set=eng

???? (????
http://hkmdb.com/db/people/view.mhtml?i ... y_set=big5

Good advice thank You - I did not check the HKFA entry
But then both "little" single entries can be merged with their aliases who have more....
Don't You think in that case (same year) Little + New will be one person ??

heinz Germany wrote:Good advice thank You - I did not check the HKFA entry
But then both "little" single entries can be merged with their aliases who have more....

Yes, I agree.

Don't You think in that case (same year) Little + New will be one person ??

I couldn't come to that conclusion. HKFA lists separately and does not connect with either. A somewhat comparable analogy would be like saying, New Elvis Presley = Little Elvis Presley.

dleedlee wrote:
According to HKFA, these are aliases:
???? (????)
http://hkmdb.com/db/people/view.mhtml?i ... ay_set=eng

???? (????
http://hkmdb.com/db/people/view.mhtml?i ... y_set=big5

Updated.