Page 1 of 1

Paragon not Golden Harvest

PostPosted: Mon Jan 27, 2003 8:10 am
by STSH
I've noticed a number of films are credited as having Golden Harvest as the filming company.<br><br>As far as I recall, all the films I've seen which have the Golden Harvest logo at the start also have at the end of the end credits <br>"copyright (year) Paragon Films Ltd".<br><br>I've worked out, by implication, that the company whose name is at the end of the end credits is usually (always ?) the filming company. Is this correct ?<br><br>I can't categorically say that this is always the case, as I don't know. It looks like every case where Golden Harvest is the filming company should be changed to Paragon Films.<br><br>Is anyone prepared to say that this is the case ?<br><br>

Re: Paragon not Golden Harvest

PostPosted: Wed Jan 29, 2003 4:38 am
by john_larocque
I second your opinion.<br><br>

Re: Paragon not Golden Harvest

PostPosted: Wed Jan 29, 2003 4:22 pm
by Bruce
I'm not sure. There might be some technical legal or tax reason why GH wanted to register their copyrights under a subsidiary name instead of their own name. But GH could still have been the filming company.<br><br>