by Brian Thibodeau » Thu Aug 04, 2005 8:24 pm
I see where you're coming from with titles like those, but the Chinese title for HIT TEAM shares ONE character with the Chinese title for HEAT TEAM. The Chinese title for COLOUR OF THE TRUTH shares TWO Chinese characters with the Chinese title of COLOUR OF THE LOYALTY. In the case of the "TEAM" films, I must admit I never once thought that "HEAT" was in any way related to "HIT," even in an anthological way.
Knowing the propensity for Hong Kong filmmakers to churn out quicky knockoffs of successful products, I usually EXPECT there to be some English titles now and again that blatantly play on earlier, likewise English titles, such as in the cases you mention. In both instances, the films share certain elements (and in the case of the "Team" films, the same director), but the fact is, their Chinese titles indicate NO connection whatsoever. Someone new to HK cinema, of course, is bound to think that these sets of films are related because their ENGLISH titles sound so similar, but I see little reason to compensate for that because the intent of the filmmakers, as indicated by the titles chosen in their own language, appears to have been NOT to draw any direct connections.
But the films I mentioned above, plus a handful of others that I'm hoping to look up soon, share EXACTLY THE SAME Chinese titles PLUS the addition of a number "2" or "II." Most of us know they are not "technically" sequels, and more like entries in an anthology, but it's far more likely that the uninformed newcomer might grab the second film first and, by spotting the numeral after the Chinese title, assume they're missing something. By making note of it here in the database, it might be helpful, even if it is only in rare instances. Perhaps even a little "NOTE: blah blah blah..." at the bottom of each listing just to help clarify the Chinese titlings. It would certainly make the listings that much more informative. Heck, I'll even type them up myself if no one wants to waste their time! Someone would have to post them for me, of course.
I realize this sounds like I'm nitpicking, but there have been many times when I've wondered for too long whether I was missing a "part 1" when I bought a particular title (like the three mentioned in my original post) and noted the "2" in the Chinese text, but not in the English text. Since these are, after all, Chinese movies, and I am, after all, a completist, I simply wished there was a resource that might direct me to a particular film's "predecessor," whether it was truly related or not.
The RAPED BY AN ANGEL series suffers from this same mixing up of English titles. The series known formally in English as Raped By An Angel 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 is not, in fact, numbered that way in Chinese.
RAPED BY AN ANGEL 2: UNIFORM FAN does indeed bear a "2" in the Chinese title, but only the two Chinese characters for "Keung Gaan" are shared between them, indicating that part 2 may belong to another series (anthologically). The first film does not appear to have ANY sequels, if you go by the Chinese titles.
RAPED BY AN ANGEL 3 does have a "3" in the Chinese title, and the Chinese characters indicate it belongs in the same series as "part 2."
RAPED BY AN ANGEL 4, based on its Chinese title, appears to be a stand-alone film given the english "RAPED" moniker by virtue, once again, of its theme alone.
RAPED BY AN ANGEL 5: THE FINAL JUDGEMENT has a "2" in the Chinese title, but FOUR of the remaining Chinese characters seemingly connect it to RAPED BY AN ANGEL 2, except that those four characters appear now appear before the "2" instead of after it. The subtitle has become the title, as it were.
My ramblings regarding them notwithstanding, I do have note somewhere connecting most of these RAPED films to their proper "anthologies" (if you will), but I don't have access to them at the moment. I'll try to look for them soon.
And don't even get me STARTED on the Gambling films like the SAINT OF GAMBLERS SERIES, the GOD OF GAMBLERS series and a few others (like MY NAME IS NOBODY) that, in their Chinese titles, have a completely different chronology that, I think, should be alluded to in individual entries for those films.
But that's just me, I suppose.