by Brian Thibodeau » Fri Jul 22, 2005 1:45 pm
OK, fine, you win.
It was Tamara trying to save Farini from the rapists. The ironic thing is that I wrote a small review of this years ago and in it this is exactly what I said. Somewhere along the way, but before I bought the new DVD, I must have watched the VCD and got myself all mixed up again.
As a footnote, I should point out that there IS a fair amount of Tamara's assets on display during this fight, even if said parts are often kept in the shadows. The old VCD, due to it's inherently inferior quality, could easily make one think they were seeing things that weren't, in fact, visible, while the new DVD does have a somewhat brighter picture, thus revealing more, uhhh, details.
This latest viewing, done entirely for the sake of readers of this board I'll have you know, did, however, reveal one problem with fights involving women in their underwear or altogether naked in Hong Kong movies: STUNT DOUBLES. I know the HK film industry is not without a small battery of stuntwomen, but we all know it's the boys doing a lot of the more limb-threatening leaps and bounds. When for scientific understanding one is freeze-framing the action of such a combat sequence and one realizes that the panty-clad heroine is, in point of fact, a panty-clad DUDE, one can easily find the thin veil of illusion mercilessly torn asunder. In the case of WOMEN ON THE RUN, thanfully, it IS Tamara doing most of her own action, but there's a couple of fast shots where she looks a little less, shall we say, feminine... Of course, your mileage may vary, but I prefer to pretend I didn't see what I thought I saw. Sorta like the fight between Jackie Chan and those glamazons in ARMOUR OF GOD: they look kinda hot on first viewing, until you realize that the majority of the fight is Jackie fighting GUYS in blackface wearing leather bustiers and pumps. (*imitates Sideshow Bob shudder*)
All I can say is thank GOD they didn't hire a stunt double for Sophia Crawford in ESCAPE FROM BROTHEL!