by Brian Thibodeau » Fri Jan 06, 2006 3:54 pm
You can add this third "like-minded" individual to the "grin and bear it camp." I've been there since day one, sad to say. My biggest relief when DVD came along was that it was simply better than the VHS tapes and Laserdiscs I'd been accustomed to for the previous 15 years - end of story (but I'll ramble on anyways).
I've always tried to stay current with the new software technologies, and have grown quite comfortable in expecting anamorphic widescreen images, restored prints and upgraded soundtracks...on American releases. I'm not so picky when it comes to "foreign" films because I, like you guys, am grateful to even HAVE the films to watch in the first place, and often for a price that's ridiculously low. And when it comes to Hong Kong films in particular, the prices, especially on back catalogue product, make the city's cinema very appealing once you've been bitten by the bug.
Around the same time DVDs first appeared in the market, and once I bought my first player, I became hooked on VCDs, so obviously quality of presentation was secondary to simply having access to Toronto's myriad stores packed to overflowing with more Hong Kong movies that I had time to watch. A close friend also in to Hong Kong cinema was the first to try a VCD on his new player, and he was decidedly unimpressed because the image sat lower on his TV screen, was slightly vertically compressed (or horizontally stretched, if you will) and in some case, the subtitles were displayed below the bottom of the screen. He warned me against buying them because he figured they must have been better suited to VCD-only players or were maybe in PAL format. Anyways, I took a couple of his discs home and found that on my own player, they looked amazing. The image was still stretched a bit, but not as badly as it was on his player, and more importantly, my Sony positioned the image in the center of the screen, which allowed full viewing of the subtitles. In any event, my buddy realized the problem was his Toshiba player, bought a more-compatible one and we both started loading up on VCDs like you wouldn't believe - and this is back when the damned things were upwards of $12-13 CDN apiece! Import Hong Kong DVDs, however, were selling for $34-$50 each, so the decision to go for quantity over quality was also very much a financial one. Sometimes it still is, although the price drops on DVDs have allowed that collection to far surpass the VCD collection in size.
in recent years, though, one of the stores I frequent in this particular Chinese mall got out of DVDs altogether (apart from the odd new releases) due to the rampant bootlegging operations that surround it. They focus more on renting and selling VCDs, along with the obligatory newspapers, magazines, and gifty stuff. Prices for their VCDs had dropped to about $4.95 CDN over the last couple of years, which was sweet enough, but lately they've been unloading everything but the newest stuff for half price! On my last two visits I picked up probably 50 VCDs, mostly obscure B-level stuff but a great way to fill in the gaps and pad out my collection of reviews (for whatever they're worth.
Now finding the time to watch them all. That's another story....
I learned a long time ago that the Hong Kong industry, it's very mindset perhaps, was not conducive to film preservation. Fast, cheap and out of control. Make the money and move on. Give the people something good enough to at least watch while not sweating the small stuff like proper surround sound mixes, preservation of camera negatives, historical importance, etc. I'm so used to a certain level of cheapness in the presentation of Hong Kong films that the newer stuff emanating from the former colony almost seems antiseptic in comparison. No less cool, mind you, just cleaner and more likely to be treated with the respect denied so many films of the 70's, 80's and 90's.
Like you Mike, I think with age comes the realization that bemoaning every audio tweak and excised frame is better left to those who haven't yet realized just how many movies are really out there and how long it can realistically take to get through even a portion of it. Is a lifetime enough? Probably not. Those folks are providing an archival service, in a way. It's just not one that benefits me directly, but it will have its value in retrospect. When I read threads at places like Home Theatre Forum, where people are posting screenshots to show you where a speckle of film dirt was not removed from a remastered print (it actually happens!), I quickly lose interest in the debates and bitching that follow. And I'm sure such pedantry will continue with the coming of HD-DVD and Blu-Ray as well. Me, I just wanna watch the damn films, as often and as many and for as long as I can. Presentation is important: this is the digital age after all, and even the Hong Kong companies are at least trying to keep the films in circulation. But in the case of said cinema, I'm willing to take what I can get a lot of the time, because what I can get is far better than nothing at all.