ewaffle wrote:...
I was surprised at how much I liked Sullivan's Travels when I finally saw it. The Lady Eve is one of my favorites although you are right about how the coincidences are just too convenient for a movie like that--things fall together a bit too perfectly for Jean, the Colonel and Muggsy when they show up in Connecticut. But I am helpless before the charms of Barbara Stanwyk (much like Henry Fonda) and she has a lot of screen time. Both "Sullivan" and "Eve" were released in 1941 which was still the 30s in movie terms I think. Also in 1941 was Ball of Fire (Stanwyk, Howard Hawks, Billy Wilder, Gary Cooper--just your typical studio product of the time) A guilty pleasure is Baby Face (1933) which must have been one of the last pre-Code movies--Stanwyk sleeps her way to the top and doesn't regret a minute of it.
Stage Door is a terrific LaCava movie--backstage comedy/drama with a killer cast and the snappiest of snappy dialog. Top Hat and (especially) The Gay Divorcee--I am a fan of both Astaire and Rogers. Mark Sandrich is Astaire's hand picked director and shoots stuff just right. "Divorcee" features Edward Everett Horton as a callow youth. Swing Time (also Astaire and Rogers) is directed by George Stevens. I have seen all of the musicals in the theater in decent prints as well as on DVD.
It Happened One Night with Gable and Colbert, directed by Frank Capra, is probably my favorite American movie from the 1930s--I watch it every couple of years--at least. The Philadelphia Story is close to perfect--George Cukor, Cary Grant, Katherine Hepburn, Jimmy Stewart as a fast talking (!) photographer.
Most of the Marx Brothers comedies although each of them is as uneven as a movie can be, particularly Duck Soup (1933), A Night at the Opera (1937).
Those are off the top of my head--all Hollywood movies. Alfred Hitchcock was still in England in the 1930s and made some masterpieces. And from France...
My top 30s:
1930s (one per director):
Bride of Frankenstein (1935: James Whale)
Les misérables (1934: Raymond Bernard)
M (1931: Fritz Lang)
Modern Times (1936: Charlie Chaplin)
Grand Illusion (1938: Jean Renoir)
The Lady Vanishes (1938: Alfred Hitchcock)
A Night at the Opera (1935: Sam Wood)
Wizard of Oz (1939: Victor Fleming)
Duck Soup (1933: Leo McCarey)
Public Enemy (1931: William A. Wellman)
ewaffle wrote:Masterofoneinchpunch wrote:My top 30s:
1930s (one per director):
Bride of Frankenstein (1935: James Whale)
Les misérables (1934: Raymond Bernard)
M (1931: Fritz Lang)
Modern Times (1936: Charlie Chaplin)
Grand Illusion (1938: Jean Renoir)
The Lady Vanishes (1938: Alfred Hitchcock)
A Night at the Opera (1935: Sam Wood)
Wizard of Oz (1939: Victor Fleming)
Duck Soup (1933: Leo McCarey)
Public Enemy (1931: William A. Wellman)
I am not organized enough to do a list of ten directors, one movie per director--I get sidetracked too easily. When I started my list of top 1930s movies I got so caught up in musicals and screwball/romantic comedies that I ignored all those great Cagney films and the Frankenstein/Dracula subgenre. "Angels With Dirty Faces", for example, for all its over the top moralizing, has long been a favorite--as has "Public Enemy".
Masterofoneinchpunch wrote:I also picked up KITTY FOYLE .
Brian, what films (and especially HK) have you been working on lately? Do you keep a list of what you have watched?
Has HK film become less popular over the last few years? My interest has actually gone up this year.
Masterofoneinchpunch wrote:The reason why I stated that it seems like HK is less poplular because several sites on HK/Asian films (especially this one) seems to have less and less participation (Kung Fu Cinema will also have its posters, but only a few seem interested in HK comedy while a few more are interested in HK Triad films).
Masterofoneinchpunch wrote:I still average one HK film a week or more.
Masterofoneinchpunch wrote:I always read the reviews here though after I watch a film (The Big Heat was watched this weekend so of course went and reviewed the reviews).
But for example Public Enemy has always been a favorite of mine too. It shot Cagney to stardom (stereotyped him which he ultimately did not like) and has several other performances and situations that put it above "Angels WIth Dirty Faces" in my opinion (which is, of course, worth watching along with The Roaring Twenties".
ewaffle wrote:Years later I worked across the street from the Clark Theater in the middle of downtown Chicago, at Clark and Madison streets. It was replaced by a fifty story building but while it was in business it ran a different double feature of old movies every day, around the clock. Sometimes it was just what they could get cheaply but once a year there would be a week or two of Cagney movies. I didn't miss many for a few years running and saw Cagney hit Mae Clark in the face with the grapefruit quite a few times as well as waiting for Cody Jarrett to tell his ma he had made it to the top of the world. That was back in the Pleistocene epoch of film watching.
Brian Thibodeau wrote: ...These three categories, especially martial arts and gangsters, seem to represent Hong Kong cinema in its entirety to quite a few people that I've read in other forums. Perhaps it's because they're young and haven't explored world cinema to its fullest just yet; perhaps they don't, can't or won't import DVDs; perhaps they simply prefer action and/or comedy over drama, history or social issues; or perhaps it's because U.S. and European distributors over the years have focused so narrowly on the action/crime genres as if that's all Hong Kong produced. Don't know, really.
Brian Thibodeau wrote:I've often wondered if some veteran internet folks--some of them are members here, no doubt--simply gorged themselves on Hong Kong cinema, often long before the rest of us, and either a) got burned out on the cinema itself (which says nothing about the current state of Hong Kong cinema, naturally) or b) got burned out debating, arguing and boasting their expertise to each other about it on message boards and felt no need to rehash with a newer wave of fans.
Brian Thibodeau wrote:...
This forum may have a small collection of devoted regulars, and our threads may not grow very fast, but at least it's all tied to something that, in theory, should be around for awhile: the database itself. Fans of Hong Kong cinema can be found at many non-HK-cinema sites, but I wonder if they know that we even have a forum here? I personally tend to think the unchanging appearance of HKMDB does little to drive traffic into the forums, let alone the cinema itself (outside of the headshots and posters on the front page driving us regulars to seek out stuff we may have missed). If it did, we'd probably have more, and newer?, contributing members helping us build up the database even faster, but alas, we wait!
...
I do this too, although many of the little odds 'n ends that I find in my Chinatown travels often have NO reviews to recommend or pan them! Not here, not anywhere, and believe me I dig deep sometimes. For a cinema that some would have us believe has been well and truly documented, there's often scant evidence online, that's for sure (unless, of course, you're talking about the top, oh, 500 films or so). Come down the ladder several rungs and the pickings sure get slim.
Masterofoneinchpunch wrote:On the flip side many ciniphiles eschew Hong Kong filmmakers with the exception of just Wong Kar-wai and occasionally Johnnie To. This is why I'm really enjoying the writing of David Bordwell who appreciates everything from Kung Fu, wuxia to the comedies and dramas. While this fickle bunch will love Taiwanese filmmakers like Tsai Ming-liang and Edward Yang (I own several of both but have not got to yet) they will laugh at John Woo, Ringo Lam, Tsui Hark as being campy (sometimes those directors are but they miss the point) as being not worthy of their Brakhage filled collection.
Because of going through the ouerve of Johnnie To I got to see him in two comedies from Cinema City (though these were still a bit atypical, Chow has done a decent amount of comedies
There is certainly a few here that fit that description though there certainly is good material coming out of Hong Kong . . . Even if you have expert knowledge in one or several facets of HK films there is still more. There is such a huge amount of films I can't see how even the most dedicated fan can watch it all. Factor in that HK films have been influenced by (if you really want to write and discuss well about a particular filmmaker, genre etc.. you have to watch/know those films too; how could you write seriously about John Woo without knowing about Jean Pierre Melville)
Even with some of the films that have four or five reviews many times they have a couple that could be removed because they are summary only and then several are just a line only
Brian Thibodeau wrote:...
I wonder if this boils down to what Western distributors choose to distribute: martial arts/action films, crime/action films, and the works of arthouse darlings like Tsai and Yang. That's fine, it's all legitimate cinema no matter how you slice it, but it doesn't represent a very broad range. The grindhouse to the arthouse, but not much in-between. I'd bet a month's salary that the majority of home viewing set-ups in North America, Europe, Australia etc. and beyond are not equipped with region-free players, nor would residents want to risk spending the money on such a device and taking up importing to feed it, and that includes people who frequent a lot of home theater forums and enjoy Asian cinema. The technological limitations, coupled with selective genre-picking of the distributors, leaves them high and dry, though they may not realizes just how high and how dry. On the other hand, I doubt there's anyone here, on a Hong Kong cinema-specific forum, who doesn't own a region free player, so in a way I guess we're all biased.
Brian Thibodeau wrote:...
. . . and they'll never get official releases in the west, either, because they don't mesh with the image of him that has been established here, an image markedly different from the one he's cultivated in Asia for the better part of three decades. Thankfully such films are ultra cheap to import these days.
...(as for the many facets of Hong Kong cinema, those Z-grade video pictures I often pick up have become invaluable in grading the performances of many actors on a much longer sliding scale , so many are there who vacillate between such productions and better-funded A-list projects higher up the food chain)
...
There was a time when editors could delete the more useless and/or offensive reviews in the database, but we don't have the permission anymore, and there's a lot of 'em still floating around. One defense given at the time was that even a one line review is still a review, although there are many instances where that could be easily argued.
Taijikid wrote:I wanted to add that, although I post infrequently, I love this board and read the posts with interest and gratitude. Keep it up.
ENHANCED ROMANCE (2004; Maga Base) Not much in the DB on this one
DRUG QUEEN (1976; Maga Base) Ditto
dleedlee wrote:ENHANCED ROMANCE (2004; Maga Base) Not much in the DB on this one
DRUG QUEEN (1976; Maga Base) Ditto
I always find the Maga Base titles tempting but the one or two I recall getting were full framed and really lousy looking color. Let me know if yours are any different.
Masterofoneinchpunch wrote:I have no problems with reselling I just wish that Best buy would put a limit on how many you could buy (an FYE worker here was litterly buying all the stocks).
I will calm down sometime (I did buy recently, but that will go on my new list).
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests